IFRS4-Insurance Contracts保险合同(Issued up to 31 December 2008)

International Financial Reporting Standard 4

Insurance Contracts

This version includes amendments resulting from IFRSs issued up to 31 December 2008.

IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts was issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)in March 2004.

IFRS 4 and its accompanying documents have been amended by the following IFRSs:••••••

IFRS7Financial Instruments: Disclosures (issued August 2005)

Financial Guarantee Contracts (Amendments to IAS 39 and IFRS 4) (issued August 2005)IFRS8Operating Segments (issued November 2006)*

IAS1Presentation of Financial Statements (as revised in September 2007)* IFRS3Business Combinations (as revised in January 2008)†

IAS27Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements (as amended in January 2008).†

In December 2005 the IASB published revised Guidance on implementing IFRS 4.The following Interpretation refers to IFRS 4:•

SIC-27 Evaluating the Substance of Transactions Involving the Legal Form of a Lease (as amended in 2004).

*†

effective date 1 January 2009effective date 1 July 2009

©

IASCF535

IFRS 4

INTRODUCTIONINTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARD 4INSURANCE CONTRACTS

OBJECTIVESCOPE

Embedded derivatives

Unbundling of deposit componentsRECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT

Temporary exemption from some other IFRSs

Liability adequacy test

Impairment of reinsurance assetsChanges in accounting policies

Current market interest ratesContinuation of existing practicesPrudence

Future investment marginsShadow accounting

Insurance contracts acquired in a business combination or portfolio transferDiscretionary participation features

Discretionary participation features in insurance contractsDiscretionary participation features in financial instrumentsDISCLOSURE

Explanation of recognised amounts

Nature and extent of risks arising from insurance contractsEFFECTIVE DATE AND TRANSITIONDisclosure

Redesignation of financial assetsAPPENDICESA Defined termsB Definition of an insurance contract C

Amendments to other IFRSs

APPROVAL BY THE BOARD OF IFRS 4 ISSUED IN MARCH 2004APPROVAL BY THE BOARD OF FINANCIAL GUARANTEE CONTRACTS (AMENDMENTS TO IAS39 AND IFRS4) ISSUED IN AUGUST 2005BASIS FOR CONCLUSIONSIMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE

536

©

IASCF

IN1–IN11

12–127–910–1213–3513–2015–19

2021–3024252627–29

3031–3334–35

343536–3936–3738–39A40–4542–44

45

IFRS 4

International Financial Reporting Standard 4 Insurance Contracts (IFRS 4) is set out inparagraphs 1–45 and Appendices A–C. All the paragraphs have equal authority.Paragraphs in bold type state the main principles. Terms defined in Appendix A are initalics the first time they appear in the Standard. Definitions of other terms are given inthe Glossary for International Financial Reporting Standards. IFRS 4 should be read inthe context of its objective and the Basis for Conclusions, the Preface to InternationalFinancial Reporting Standards and the Framework for the Preparation and Presentation ofFinancial Statements. IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errorsprovides a basis for selecting and applying accounting policies in the absence of explicitguidance.

©

IASCF537

IFRS 4

Introduction

Reasons for issuing the IFRS

IN1

This is the first IFRS to deal with insurance contracts. Accounting practices forinsurance contracts have been diverse, and have often differed from practices inother sectors. Because many entities will adopt IFRSs in 2005, the InternationalAccounting Standards Board has issued this IFRS: (a)(b)

IN2

to make limited improvements to accounting for insurance contracts untilthe Board completes the second phase of its project on insurance contracts.to require any entity issuing insurance contracts (an insurer) to discloseinformation about those contracts.

This IFRS is a stepping stone to phase II of this project. The Board is committed tocompleting phase II without delay once it has investigated all relevant conceptualand practical questions and completed its full due process.

Main features of the IFRS

IN3

The IFRS applies to all insurance contracts (including reinsurance contracts) thatan entity issues and to reinsurance contracts that it holds, except for specifiedcontracts covered by other IFRSs. It does not apply to other assets and liabilitiesof an insurer, such as financial assets and financial liabilities within the scope ofIAS39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. Furthermore, it does notaddress accounting by policyholders.

The IFRS exempts an insurer temporarily (ie during phase I of this project) fromsome requirements of other IFRSs, including the requirement to consider theFramework in selecting accounting policies for insurance contracts. However, theIFRS: (a)

prohibits provisions for possible claims under contracts that are not inexistence at the end of the reporting period (such as catastrophe andequalisation provisions).

requires a test for the adequacy of recognised insurance liabilities and animpairment test for reinsurance assets.

requires an insurer to keep insurance liabilities in its statement of financialposition until they are discharged or cancelled, or expire, and to presentinsurance liabilities without offsetting them against related reinsuranceassets.

IN4

(b)(c)

IN5

The IFRS permits an insurer to change its accounting policies for insurancecontracts only if, as a result, its financial statements present information that ismore relevant and no less reliable, or more reliable and no less relevant.Inparticular, an insurer cannot introduce any of the following practices,although it may continue using accounting policies that involve them: (a)

measuring insurance liabilities on an undiscounted basis.

538

©

IASCF

IFRS 4

(b)

measuring contractual rights to future investment management fees at anamount that exceeds their fair value as implied by a comparison withcurrent fees charged by other market participants for similar services.using non-uniform accounting policies for the insurance liabilities ofsubsidiaries.

(c)

IN6

The IFRS permits the introduction of an accounting policy that involvesremeasuring designated insurance liabilities consistently in each period to reflectcurrent market interest rates (and, if the insurer so elects, other current estimatesand assumptions). Without this permission, an insurer would have been requiredto apply the change in accounting policies consistently to all similar liabilities.An insurer need not change its accounting policies for insurance contracts toeliminate excessive prudence. However, if an insurer already measures itsinsurance contracts with sufficient prudence, it should not introduce additionalprudence.

There is a rebuttable presumption that an insurer’s financial statements willbecome less relevant and reliable if it introduces an accounting policy thatreflects future investment margins in the measurement of insurance contracts.When an insurer changes its accounting policies for insurance liabilities, it mayreclassify some or all financial assets as ‘at fair value through profit or loss’.The IFRS: (a)

clarifies that an insurer need not account for an embedded derivativeseparately at fair value if the embedded derivative meets the definition ofan insurance contract.

requires an insurer to unbundle (ie account separately for) depositcomponents of some insurance contracts, to avoid the omission of assetsand liabilities from its statement of financial position.

clarifies the applicability of the practice sometimes known as ‘shadowaccounting’.

permits an expanded presentation for insurance contracts acquired in abusiness combination or portfolio transfer.

addresses limited aspects of discretionary participation features containedin insurance contracts or financial instruments.

IN7

IN8

IN9IN10

(b)

(c)(d)(e)

IN11

The IFRS requires disclosure to help users understand: (a)(b)

the amounts in the insurer’s financial statements that arise frominsurance contracts.

the nature and extent of risks arising from insurance contracts.

IN12[Deleted]

Potential impact of future proposals

IN13

[Deleted]

©

IASCF539

IFRS 4

International Financial Reporting Standard 4Insurance Contracts

Objective

1

The objective of this IFRS is to specify the financial reporting for insurance contractsby any entity that issues such contracts (described in this IFRS as an insurer) untilthe Board completes the second phase of its project on insurance contracts.Inparticular, this IFRS requires: (a)(b)

limited improvements to accounting by insurers for insurance contracts.disclosure that identifies and explains the amounts in an insurer’sfinancial statements arising from insurance contracts and helps users ofthose financial statements understand the amount, timing anduncertainty of future cash flows from insurance contracts.

Scope

2

An entity shall apply this IFRS to: (a)(b)

insurance contracts (including reinsurance contracts) that it issues andreinsurance contracts that it holds.

financial instruments that it issues with a discretionary participation feature(see paragraph 35). IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures requires disclosureabout financial instruments, including financial instruments that containsuch features.

3

This IFRS does not address other aspects of accounting by insurers, such asaccounting for financial assets held by insurers and financial liabilities issued byinsurers (see IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation, IAS 39 Financial Instruments:Recognition and Measurement and IFRS 7), except in the transitional provisions inparagraph 45.

An entity shall not apply this IFRS to: (a)

product warranties issued directly by a manufacturer, dealer or retailer(seeIAS 18 Revenue and IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and ContingentAssets).

employers’ assets and liabilities under employee benefit plans (see IAS19Employee Benefits and IFRS 2 Share-based Payment) and retirement benefitobligations reported by defined benefit retirement plans (see IAS 26Accounting and Reporting by Retirement Benefit Plans).

contractual rights or contractual obligations that are contingent on thefuture use of, or right to use, a non-financial item (for example, somelicence fees, royalties, contingent lease payments and similar items), as wellas a lessee’s residual value guarantee embedded in a finance lease(seeIAS17 Leases, IAS 18 Revenue and IAS 38 Intangible Assets).

financial guarantee contracts unless the issuer has previously assertedexplicitly that it regards such contracts as insurance contracts and has used

4

(b)

(c)

(d)

540

©

IASCF

IFRS 4

accounting applicable to insurance contracts, in which case the issuer mayelect to apply either IAS 39, IAS 32 and IFRS 7 or this Standard to suchfinancial guarantee contracts. The issuer may make that election contractby contract, but the election for each contract is irrevocable.(e)(f)

contingent consideration payable or receivable in a business combination(see IFRS3 Business Combinations).

direct insurance contracts that the entity holds (ie direct insurance contracts inwhich the entity is the policyholder). However, a cedant shall apply this IFRSto reinsurance contracts that it holds.

5

For ease of reference, this IFRS describes any entity that issues an insurancecontract as an insurer, whether or not the issuer is regarded as an insurer for legalor supervisory purposes.

A reinsurance contract is a type of insurance contract. Accordingly, all referencesin this IFRS to insurance contracts also apply to reinsurance contracts.

6

Embedded derivatives

7

IAS 39 requires an entity to separate some embedded derivatives from their hostcontract, measure them at fair value and include changes in their fair value inprofit or loss. IAS 39 applies to derivatives embedded in an insurance contractunless the embedded derivative is itself an insurance contract.

As an exception to the requirement in IAS 39, an insurer need not separate, andmeasure at fair value, a policyholder’s option to surrender an insurance contractfor a fixed amount (or for an amount based on a fixed amount and an interestrate), even if the exercise price differs from the carrying amount of the hostinsurance liability. However, the requirement in IAS 39 does apply to a put optionor cash surrender option embedded in an insurance contract if the surrendervalue varies in response to the change in a financial variable (such as an equity orcommodity price or index), or a non-financial variable that is not specific to aparty to the contract. Furthermore, that requirement also applies if the holder’sability to exercise a put option or cash surrender option is triggered by a changein such a variable (for example, a put option that can be exercised if a stockmarket index reaches a specified level).

Paragraph 8 applies equally to options to surrender a financial instrumentcontaining a discretionary participation feature.

8

9

Unbundling of deposit components

10

Some insurance contracts contain both an insurance component and a depositcomponent. In some cases, an insurer is required or permitted to unbundle thosecomponents: (a)

unbundling is required if both the following conditions are met:(i)

the insurer can measure the deposit component (including anyembedded surrender options) separately (ie without considering theinsurance component).

©

IASCF541

IFRS 4

(ii)

the insurer’s accounting policies do not otherwise require it torecognise all obligations and rights arising from the depositcomponent.

(b)

unbundling is permitted, but not required, if the insurer can measure thedeposit component separately as in (a)(i) but its accounting policies requireit to recognise all obligations and rights arising from the depositcomponent, regardless of the basis used to measure those rights andobligations.

unbundling is prohibited if an insurer cannot measure the depositcomponent separately as in (a)(i).

(c)

11

The following is an example of a case when an insurer’s accounting policies donot require it to recognise all obligations arising from a deposit component.Acedant receives compensation for losses from a reinsurer, but the contractobliges the cedant to repay the compensation in future years. That obligationarises from a deposit component. If the cedant’s accounting policies wouldotherwise permit it to recognise the compensation as income withoutrecognising the resulting obligation, unbundling is required. To unbundle a contract, an insurer shall: (a)(b)

apply this IFRS to the insurance component.apply IAS39 to the deposit component.

12

Recognition and measurement

Temporary exemption from some other IFRSs

13

Paragraphs 10–12 of IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates andErrors specify criteria for an entity to use in developing an accounting policy if noIFRS applies specifically to an item. However, this IFRS exempts an insurer fromapplying those criteria to its accounting policies for: (a)

insurance contracts that it issues (including related acquisition costs andrelated intangible assets, such as those described in paragraphs 31 and 32);and

reinsurance contracts that it holds.

(b)

14

Nevertheless, this IFRS does not exempt an insurer from some implications of thecriteria in paragraphs 10–12 of IAS 8. Specifically, an insurer: (a)

shall not recognise as a liability any provisions for possible future claims, ifthose claims arise under insurance contracts that are not in existence at theend of the reporting period (such as catastrophe provisions and equalisationprovisions).

shall carry out the liability adequacy test described in paragraphs 15–19. shall remove an insurance liability (or a part of an insurance liability) fromits statement of financial position when, and only when, it isextinguished—ie when the obligation specified in the contract isdischarged or cancelled or expires.

(b)(c)

542

©

IASCF

IFRS 4

(d)shall not offset:(i)(ii)

reinsurance assets against the related insurance liabilities; or

income or expense from reinsurance contracts against the expense orincome from the related insurance contracts.

(e)

shall consider whether its reinsurance assets are impaired(seeparagraph20).

Liability adequacy test

15

An insurer shall assess at the end of each reporting period whether its recognisedinsurance liabilities are adequate, using current estimates of future cash flowsunder its insurance contracts. If that assessment shows that the carrying amountof its insurance liabilities (less related deferred acquisition costs and relatedintangible assets, such as those discussed in paragraphs 31 and 32) is inadequatein the light of the estimated future cash flows, the entire deficiency shall berecognised in profit or loss.

16

If an insurer applies a liability adequacy test that meets specified minimumrequirements, this IFRS imposes no further requirements. The minimumrequirements are the following: (a)

The test considers current estimates of all contractual cash flows, and ofrelated cash flows such as claims handling costs, as well as cash flowsresulting from embedded options and guarantees.

If the test shows that the liability is inadequate, the entire deficiency isrecognised in profit or loss.

(b)

17

If an insurer’s accounting policies do not require a liability adequacy test thatmeets the minimum requirements of paragraph 16, the insurer shall: (a)

determine the carrying amount of the relevant insurance liabilities* lessthe carrying amount of: (i)(ii)

any related deferred acquisition costs; and

any related intangible assets, such as those acquired in a businesscombination or portfolio transfer (see paragraphs 31 and 32).However, related reinsurance assets are not considered because aninsurer accounts for them separately (see paragraph 20).

(b)

determine whether the amount described in (a) is less than the carryingamount that would be required if the relevant insurance liabilities werewithin the scope of IAS 37. If it is less, the insurer shall recognise the entiredifference in profit or loss and decrease the carrying amount of the relateddeferred acquisition costs or related intangible assets or increase thecarrying amount of the relevant insurance liabilities.

*

The relevant insurance liabilities are those insurance liabilities (and related deferred acquisitioncosts and related intangible assets) for which the insurer’s accounting policies do not require aliability adequacy test that meets the minimum requirements of paragraph 16.

©

IASCF543

IFRS 4

18

If an insurer’s liability adequacy test meets the minimum requirements ofparagraph 16, the test is applied at the level of aggregation specified in that test.Ifits liability adequacy test does not meet those minimum requirements, thecomparison described in paragraph 17 shall be made at the level of a portfolio ofcontracts that are subject to broadly similar risks and managed together as asingle portfolio.

The amount described in paragraph 17(b) (ie the result of applying IAS 37) shallreflect future investment margins (see paragraphs 27–29) if, and only if, theamount described in paragraph 17(a) also reflects those margins.

19

Impairment of reinsurance assets

20

If a cedant’s reinsurance asset is impaired, the cedant shall reduce its carryingamount accordingly and recognise that impairment loss in profit or loss.Areinsurance asset is impaired if, and only if: (a)

there is objective evidence, as a result of an event that occurred after initialrecognition of the reinsurance asset, that the cedant may not receive allamounts due to it under the terms of the contract; and

that event has a reliably measurable impact on the amounts that thecedant will receive from the reinsurer.

(b)

Changes in accounting policies

2122

Paragraphs 22–30 apply both to changes made by an insurer that already appliesIFRSs and to changes made by an insurer adopting IFRSs for the first time.An insurer may change its accounting policies for insurance contracts if, and onlyif, the change makes the financial statements more relevant to the economicdecision-making needs of users and no less reliable, or more reliable and no lessrelevant to those needs. An insurer shall judge relevance and reliability by thecriteria in IAS 8.

23

To justify changing its accounting policies for insurance contracts, an insurershall show that the change brings its financial statements closer to meeting thecriteria in IAS 8, but the change need not achieve full compliance with thosecriteria. The following specific issues are discussed below: (a)(b)(c)(d)(e)

current interest rates (paragraph 24);

continuation of existing practices (paragraph 25); prudence (paragraph 26);

future investment margins (paragraphs 27–29); and shadow accounting (paragraph 30).

Current market interest rates

24

An insurer is permitted, but not required, to change its accounting policies sothat it remeasures designated insurance liabilities* to reflect current marketinterest rates and recognises changes in those liabilities in profit or loss. At that

In this paragraph, insurance liabilities include related deferred acquisition costs and relatedintangible assets, such as those discussed in paragraphs 31 and 32.

*

544

©

IASCF

IFRS 4

time, it may also introduce accounting policies that require other currentestimates and assumptions for the designated liabilities. The election in thisparagraph permits an insurer to change its accounting policies for designatedliabilities, without applying those policies consistently to all similar liabilities asIAS8 would otherwise require. If an insurer designates liabilities for this election,it shall continue to apply current market interest rates (and, if applicable, theother current estimates and assumptions) consistently in all periods to all theseliabilities until they are extinguished.

Continuation of existing practices

25

An insurer may continue the following practices, but the introduction of any ofthem does not satisfy paragraph 22: (a)(b)

measuring insurance liabilities on an undiscounted basis.

measuring contractual rights to future investment management fees at anamount that exceeds their fair value as implied by a comparison withcurrent fees charged by other market participants for similar services. It islikely that the fair value at inception of those contractual rights equals theorigination costs paid, unless future investment management fees andrelated costs are out of line with market comparables.

using non-uniform accounting policies for the insurance contracts (andrelated deferred acquisition costs and related intangible assets, if any) ofsubsidiaries, except as permitted by paragraph 24. If those accountingpolicies are not uniform, an insurer may change them if the change doesnot make the accounting policies more diverse and also satisfies the otherrequirements in this IFRS.

(c)

Prudence

26

An insurer need not change its accounting policies for insurance contracts toeliminate excessive prudence. However, if an insurer already measures itsinsurance contracts with sufficient prudence, it shall not introduce additionalprudence.

Future investment margins

27

An insurer need not change its accounting policies for insurance contracts toeliminate future investment margins. However, there is a rebuttablepresumption that an insurer’s financial statements will become less relevant andreliable if it introduces an accounting policy that reflects future investmentmargins in the measurement of insurance contracts, unless those margins affectthe contractual payments. Two examples of accounting policies that reflect thosemargins are: (a)(b)

using a discount rate that reflects the estimated return on the insurer’sassets; or

projecting the returns on those assets at an estimated rate of return,discounting those projected returns at a different rate and including theresult in the measurement of the liability.

©

IASCF545

IFRS 4

28

An insurer may overcome the rebuttable presumption described in paragraph 27if, and only if, the other components of a change in accounting policies increasethe relevance and reliability of its financial statements sufficiently to outweighthe decrease in relevance and reliability caused by the inclusion of futureinvestment margins. For example, suppose that an insurer’s existing accountingpolicies for insurance contracts involve excessively prudent assumptions set atinception and a discount rate prescribed by a regulator without direct referenceto market conditions, and ignore some embedded options and guarantees.Theinsurer might make its financial statements more relevant and no lessreliable by switching to a comprehensive investor-oriented basis of accountingthat is widely used and involves: (a)(b)(c)(d)

current estimates and assumptions;

a reasonable (but not excessively prudent) adjustment to reflect risk anduncertainty;

measurements that reflect both the intrinsic value and time value ofembedded options and guarantees; and

a current market discount rate, even if that discount rate reflects theestimated return on the insurer’s assets.

29

In some measurement approaches, the discount rate is used to determine thepresent value of a future profit margin. That profit margin is then attributed todifferent periods using a formula. In those approaches, the discount rate affectsthe measurement of the liability only indirectly. In particular, the use of a lessappropriate discount rate has a limited or no effect on the measurement of theliability at inception. However, in other approaches, the discount rate determinesthe measurement of the liability directly. In the latter case, because theintroduction of an asset-based discount rate has a more significant effect, it ishighly unlikely that an insurer could overcome the rebuttable presumptiondescribed in paragraph 27.

Shadow accounting

30

In some accounting models, realised gains or losses on an insurer’s assets have adirect effect on the measurement of some or all of (a) its insurance liabilities,(b)related deferred acquisition costs and (c) related intangible assets, such asthose described in paragraphs 31 and 32. An insurer is permitted, but notrequired, to change its accounting policies so that a recognised but unrealisedgain or loss on an asset affects those measurements in the same way that arealised gain or loss does. The related adjustment to the insurance liability(ordeferred acquisition costs or intangible assets) shall be recognised in othercomprehensive income if, and only if, the unrealised gains or losses arerecognised in other comprehensive income. This practice is sometimes describedas ‘shadow accounting’.

546

©

IASCF

IFRS 4

Insurance contracts acquired in a business combination or portfolio transfer

31

To comply with IFRS3, an insurer shall, at the acquisition date, measure at fairvalue the insurance liabilities assumed and insurance assets acquired in a businesscombination. However, an insurer is permitted, but not required, to use anexpanded presentation that splits the fair value of acquired insurance contractsinto two components: (a)(b)

a liability measured in accordance with the insurer’s accounting policiesfor insurance contracts that it issues; and

an intangible asset, representing the difference between (i) the fair value ofthe contractual insurance rights acquired and insurance obligationsassumed and (ii) the amount described in (a). The subsequent measurementof this asset shall be consistent with the measurement of the relatedinsurance liability.

3233

An insurer acquiring a portfolio of insurance contracts may use the expandedpresentation described in paragraph 31.

The intangible assets described in paragraphs 31 and 32 are excluded from thescope of IAS 36 Impairment of Assets and IAS 38. However, IAS 36 and IAS 38 applyto customer lists and customer relationships reflecting the expectation of futurecontracts that are not part of the contractual insurance rights and contractualinsurance obligations that existed at the date of a business combination orportfolio transfer.

Discretionary participation features

Discretionary participation features in insurance contracts

34

Some insurance contracts contain a discretionary participation feature as well asa guaranteed element. The issuer of such a contract: (a)

may, but need not, recognise the guaranteed element separately from thediscretionary participation feature. If the issuer does not recognise themseparately, it shall classify the whole contract as a liability. If the issuerclassifies them separately, it shall classify the guaranteed element as aliability.

shall, if it recognises the discretionary participation feature separatelyfrom the guaranteed element, classify that feature as either a liability or aseparate component of equity. This IFRS does not specify how the issuerdetermines whether that feature is a liability or equity. The issuer maysplit that feature into liability and equity components and shall use aconsistent accounting policy for that split. The issuer shall not classify thatfeature as an intermediate category that is neither liability nor equity.may recognise all premiums received as revenue without separating anyportion that relates to the equity component. The resulting changes in theguaranteed element and in the portion of the discretionary participationfeature classified as a liability shall be recognised in profit or loss. If part orall of the discretionary participation feature is classified in equity, a

(b)

(c)

©

IASCF547

IFRS 4

portion of profit or loss may be attributable to that feature (in the sameway that a portion may be attributable to non-controlling interests).Theissuer shall recognise the portion of profit or loss attributable to anyequity component of a discretionary participation feature as an allocationof profit or loss, not as expense or income (see IAS 1 Presentation of FinancialStatements). (d)(e)

shall, if the contract contains an embedded derivative within the scope ofIAS39, apply IAS39 to that embedded derivative.

shall, in all respects not described in paragraphs 14–20 and 34(a)–(d),continue its existing accounting policies for such contracts, unless itchanges those accounting policies in a way that complies with paragraphs21–30.

Discretionary participation features in financial instruments

35

The requirements in paragraph 34 also apply to a financial instrument thatcontains a discretionary participation feature. In addition: (a)

if the issuer classifies the entire discretionary participation feature as aliability, it shall apply the liability adequacy test in paragraphs 15–19 to thewhole contract (ie both the guaranteed element and the discretionaryparticipation feature). The issuer need not determine the amount thatwould result from applying IAS 39 to the guaranteed element.

if the issuer classifies part or all of that feature as a separate component ofequity, the liability recognised for the whole contract shall not be less thanthe amount that would result from applying IAS 39 to the guaranteedelement. That amount shall include the intrinsic value of an option tosurrender the contract, but need not include its time value if paragraph 9exempts that option from measurement at fair value. The issuer need notdisclose the amount that would result from applying IAS 39 to theguaranteed element, nor need it present that amount separately.Furthermore, the issuer need not determine that amount if the totalliability recognised is clearly higher.

although these contracts are financial instruments, the issuer maycontinue to recognise the premiums for those contracts as revenue andrecognise as an expense the resulting increase in the carrying amount ofthe liability.

although these contracts are financial instruments, an issuer applyingparagraph 20(b) of IFRS 7 to contracts with a discretionary participationfeature shall disclose the total interest expense recognised in profit or loss,but need not calculate such interest expense using the effective interestmethod.

(b)

(c)

(d)

548

©

IASCF

IFRS 4

Disclosure

Explanation of recognised amounts

36

An insurer shall disclose information that identifies and explains the amounts inits financial statements arising from insurance contracts.

37To comply with paragraph 36, an insurer shall disclose: (a)(b)

its accounting policies for insurance contracts and related assets, liabilities,income and expense.

the recognised assets, liabilities, income and expense (and, if it presents itsstatement of cash flows using the direct method, cash flows) arising frominsurance contracts. Furthermore, if the insurer is a cedant, it shalldisclose:(i)(ii)

gains and losses recognised in profit or loss on buying reinsurance;and

if the cedant defers and amortises gains and losses arising on buyingreinsurance, the amortisation for the period and the amountsremaining unamortised at the beginning and end of the period.

(c)

the process used to determine the assumptions that have the greatest effecton the measurement of the recognised amounts described in (b). Whenpracticable, an insurer shall also give quantified disclosure of thoseassumptions.

the effect of changes in assumptions used to measure insurance assets andinsurance liabilities, showing separately the effect of each change that hasa material effect on the financial statements.

reconciliations of changes in insurance liabilities, reinsurance assets and, ifany, related deferred acquisition costs.

(d)

(e)

Nature and extent of risks arising from insurance contracts

38

An insurer shall disclose information that enables users of its financialstatements to evaluate the nature and extent of risks arising from insurancecontracts.

39To comply with paragraph 38, an insurer shall disclose: (a)(b)(c)

its objectives, policies and processes for managing risks arising frominsurance contracts and the methods used to manage those risks.[deleted]

information about insurance risk (both before and after risk mitigation byreinsurance), including information about: (i)(ii)

sensitivity to insurance risk (see paragraph 39A).

concentrations of insurance risk, including a description of howmanagement determines concentrations and a description of the

©

IASCF549

IFRS 4

shared characteristic that identifies each concentration (eg type ofinsured event, geographical area, or currency).(iii)

actual claims compared with previous estimates (ie claimsdevelopment). The disclosure about claims development shall go backto the period when the earliest material claim arose for which there isstill uncertainty about the amount and timing of the claimspayments, but need not go back more than ten years. An insurer neednot disclose this information for claims for which uncertainty aboutthe amount and timing of claims payments is typically resolvedwithin one year.

(d)

information about credit risk, liquidity risk and market risk thatparagraphs 31–42 of IFRS 7 would require if the insurance contracts werewithin the scope of IFRS 7. However:(i)

an insurer need not provide the maturity analysis required byparagraph 39(a) of IFRS 7 if it discloses information about theestimated timing of the net cash outflows resulting from recognisedinsurance liabilities instead. This may take the form of an analysis, byestimated timing, of the amounts recognised in the statement offinancial position.

if an insurer uses an alternative method to manage sensitivity tomarket conditions, such as an embedded value analysis, it may usethat sensitivity analysis to meet the requirement in paragraph 40(a) ofIFRS7. Such an insurer shall also provide the disclosures requiredbyparagraph 41 of IFRS 7.

(ii)

(e)

information about exposures to market risk arising from embeddedderivatives contained in a host insurance contract if the insurer is notrequired to, and does not, measure the embedded derivatives at fair value.

39A

To comply with paragraph 39(c)(i), an insurer shall disclose either (a) or (b) asfollows:(a)

a sensitivity analysis that shows how profit or loss and equity would havebeen affected if changes in the relevant risk variable that were reasonablypossible at the end of the reporting period had occurred; the methods andassumptions used in preparing the sensitivity analysis; and any changesfrom the previous period in the methods and assumptions used. However,if an insurer uses an alternative method to manage sensitivity to marketconditions, such as an embedded value analysis, it may meet thisrequirement by disclosing that alternative sensitivity analysis and thedisclosures required by paragraph 41 of IFRS7.

qualitative information about sensitivity, and information about thoseterms and conditions of insurance contracts that have a material effect onthe amount, timing and uncertainty of the insurer’s future cash flows.

(b)

550

©

IASCF

IFRS 4

Effective date and transition

40

The transitional provisions in paragraphs 41–45 apply both to an entity that isalready applying IFRSs when it first applies this IFRS and to an entity that appliesIFRSs for the first-time (a first-time adopter).

An entity shall apply this IFRS for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January2005. Earlier application is encouraged. If an entity applies this IFRS for an earlierperiod, it shall disclose that fact.

Financial Guarantee Contracts (Amendments to IAS39 and IFRS4), issued in August2005, amended paragraphs 4(d), B18(g) and B19(f). An entity shall apply thoseamendments for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2006. Earlierapplication is encouraged. If an entity applies those amendments for an earlierperiod, it shall disclose that fact and apply the related amendments to IAS39 andIAS32* at the same time.

IAS 1 (as revised in 2007) amended the terminology used throughout IFRSs.Inaddition it amended paragraph 30. An entity shall apply those amendmentsfor annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2009. If an entity appliesIAS1 (revised 2007) for an earlier period, the amendments shall be applied forthat earlier period.

41

41A

41B

Disclosure

42

An entity need not apply the disclosure requirements in this IFRS to comparativeinformation that relates to annual periods beginning before 1 January 2005,except for the disclosures required by paragraph 37(a) and (b) about accountingpolicies, and recognised assets, liabilities, income and expense (and cash flows ifthe direct method is used).

If it is impracticable to apply a particular requirement of paragraphs 10–35 tocomparative information that relates to annual periods beginning before1January 2005, an entity shall disclose that fact. Applying the liability adequacytest (paragraphs 15–19) to such comparative information might sometimes beimpracticable, but it is highly unlikely to be impracticable to apply otherrequirements of paragraphs 10–35 to such comparative information.IAS8explains the term ‘impracticable’.

In applying paragraph 39(c)(iii), an entity need not disclose information aboutclaims development that occurred earlier than five years before the end of thefirst financial year in which it applies this IFRS. Furthermore, if it isimpracticable, when an entity first applies this IFRS, to prepare informationabout claims development that occurred before the beginning of the earliestperiod for which an entity presents full comparative information that complieswith this IFRS, the entity shall disclose that fact.

43

44

*When an entity applies IFRS7, the reference to IAS32 is replaced by a reference to IFRS7.

©

IASCF551

IFRS 4

Redesignation of financial assets

45

When an insurer changes its accounting policies for insurance liabilities, it ispermitted, but not required, to reclassify some or all of its financial assets as ‘atfair value through profit or loss’. This reclassification is permitted if an insurerchanges accounting policies when it first applies this IFRS and if it makes asubsequent policy change permitted by paragraph 22. The reclassification is achange in accounting policy and IAS8 applies.

552

©

IASCF

IFRS 4

Appendix ADefined terms

This appendix is an integral part of the IFRS.cedant

deposit component

The policyholder under a reinsurance contract.

A contractual component that is not accounted for as aderivative under IAS39 and would be within the scope of IAS 39if it were a separate instrument.

direct insurance contractAn insurance contract that is not a reinsurance contract.discretionary

participation feature

A contractual right to receive, as a supplement to guaranteedbenefits, additional benefits: (a)(b)(c)

that are likely to be a significant portion of the totalcontractual benefits;

whose amount or timing is contractually at thediscretion of the issuer; andthat are contractually based on: (i)(ii)(iii)

the performance of a specified pool of contracts ora specified type of contract;

realised and/or unrealised investment returns on aspecified pool of assets held by the issuer; orthe profit or loss of the company, fund or otherentity that issues the contract.

fair value

The amount for which an asset could be exchanged, or aliability settled, between knowledgeable, willing parties in anarm’s length transaction.

A contract that requires the issuer to make specified paymentsto reimburse the holder for a loss it incurs because a specifieddebtor fails to make payment when due in accordance with theoriginal or modified terms of a debt instrument.

The risk of a possible future change in one or more of aspecified interest rate, financial instrument price, commodityprice, foreign exchange rate, index of prices or rates, creditrating or credit index or other variable, provided in the case ofa non-financial variable that the variable is not specific to aparty to the contract.

Payments or other benefits to which a particular policyholderor investor has an unconditional right that is not subject to thecontractual discretion of the issuer.

financial guarantee contract

financial risk

guaranteed benefits

©

IASCF553

IFRS 4

guaranteed element

insurance asset

insurance contract

insurance liability

insurance risk

insured event

insurer

liability adequacy test

policyholder

reinsurance assetsreinsurance contract

reinsurer

unbundle

554

An obligation to pay guaranteed benefits, included in acontract that contains a discretionary participation feature.An insurer’s net contractual rights under an insurancecontract.

A contract under which one party (the insurer) acceptssignificant insurance risk from another party (the policyholder)by agreeing to compensate the policyholder if a specifieduncertain future event (the insured event) adversely affects thepolicyholder. (SeeAppendix B for guidance on this definition.)An insurer’s net contractual obligations under an insurancecontract.

Risk, other than financial risk, transferred from the holder of acontract to the issuer.

An uncertain future event that is covered by an insurancecontract and creates insurance risk.

The party that has an obligation under an insurance contract tocompensate a policyholder if an insured event occurs.

An assessment of whether the carrying amount of an insuranceliability needs to be increased (or the carrying amount ofrelated deferred acquisition costs or related intangible assetsdecreased), based on a review of future cash flows.

A party that has a right to compensation under an insurancecontract if an insured event occurs.

A cedant’s net contractual rights under a reinsurance contract.An insurance contract issued by one insurer (the reinsurer) tocompensate another insurer (the cedant) for losses on one ormore contracts issued by the cedant.

The party that has an obligation under a reinsurance contractto compensate a cedant if an insured event occurs.

Account for the components of a contract as if they wereseparate contracts.

©

IASCF

IFRS 4

Appendix B

Definition of an insurance contract

This appendix is an integral part of the IFRS.B1

This appendix gives guidance on the definition of an insurance contract inAppendix A. It addresses the following issues: (a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)

the term ‘uncertain future event’ (paragraphs B2–B4); payments in kind (paragraphs B5–B7);

insurance risk and other risks (paragraphs B8–B17); examples of insurance contracts (paragraphs B18–B21); significant insurance risk (paragraphs B22–B28); and

changes in the level of insurance risk (paragraphs B29 and B30).

Uncertain future event

B2

Uncertainty (or risk) is the essence of an insurance contract. Accordingly, at leastone of the following is uncertain at the inception of an insurance contract: (a)(b)(c)

B3

whether an insured event will occur; when it will occur; or

how much the insurer will need to pay if it occurs.

In some insurance contracts, the insured event is the discovery of a loss during theterm of the contract, even if the loss arises from an event that occurred before theinception of the contract. In other insurance contracts, the insured event is anevent that occurs during the term of the contract, even if the resulting loss isdiscovered after the end of the contract term.

Some insurance contracts cover events that have already occurred, but whosefinancial effect is still uncertain. An example is a reinsurance contract that coversthe direct insurer against adverse development of claims already reported bypolicyholders. In such contracts, the insured event is the discovery of theultimate cost of those claims.

B4

Payments in kind

B5

Some insurance contracts require or permit payments to be made in kind.Anexample is when the insurer replaces a stolen article directly, instead ofreimbursing the policyholder. Another example is when an insurer uses its ownhospitals and medical staff to provide medical services covered by the contracts. Some fixed-fee service contracts in which the level of service depends on anuncertain event meet the definition of an insurance contract in this IFRS but arenot regulated as insurance contracts in some countries. One example is amaintenance contract in which the service provider agrees to repair specifiedequipment after a malfunction. The fixed service fee is based on the expectednumber of malfunctions, but it is uncertain whether a particular machine will

B6

©

IASCF555

IFRS 4

break down. The malfunction of the equipment adversely affects its owner andthe contract compensates the owner (in kind, rather than cash). Another exampleis a contract for car breakdown services in which the provider agrees, for a fixedannual fee, to provide roadside assistance or tow the car to a nearby garage.Thelatter contract could meet the definition of an insurance contract even if theprovider does not agree to carry out repairs or replace parts.

B7

Applying the IFRS to the contracts described in paragraph B6 is likely to be nomore burdensome than applying the IFRSs that would be applicable if suchcontracts were outside the scope of this IFRS: (a)(b)

There are unlikely to be material liabilities for malfunctions andbreakdowns that have already occurred.

If IAS18 Revenue applied, the service provider would recognise revenue byreference to the stage of completion (and subject to other specified criteria).That approach is also acceptable under this IFRS, which permits the serviceprovider (i) to continue its existing accounting policies for these contractsunless they involve practices prohibited by paragraph 14 and (ii) to improveits accounting policies if so permitted by paragraphs 22–30.

The service provider considers whether the cost of meeting its contractualobligation to provide services exceeds the revenue received in advance.Todo this, it applies the liability adequacy test described in paragraphs 15–19of this IFRS. If this IFRS did not apply to these contracts, the serviceprovider would apply IAS 37 to determine whether the contracts areonerous.

For these contracts, the disclosure requirements in this IFRS are unlikely toadd significantly to disclosures required by other IFRSs.

(c)

(d)

Distinction between insurance risk and other risks

B8

The definition of an insurance contract refers to insurance risk, which this IFRSdefines as risk, other than financial risk, transferred from the holder of a contractto the issuer. A contract that exposes the issuer to financial risk withoutsignificant insurance risk is not an insurance contract.

The definition of financial risk in Appendix A includes a list of financial andnon-financial variables. That list includes non-financial variables that are notspecific to a party to the contract, such as an index of earthquake losses in aparticular region or an index of temperatures in a particular city. It excludesnon-financial variables that are specific to a party to the contract, such as theoccurrence or non-occurrence of a fire that damages or destroys an asset of thatparty. Furthermore, the risk of changes in the fair value of a non-financial assetis not a financial risk if the fair value reflects not only changes in market pricesfor such assets (a financial variable) but also the condition of a specificnon-financial asset held by a party to a contract (a non-financial variable).Forexample, if a guarantee of the residual value of a specific car exposes theguarantor to the risk of changes in the car’s physical condition, that risk isinsurance risk, not financial risk.

B9

556

©

IASCF

IFRS 4

B10

Some contracts expose the issuer to financial risk, in addition to significantinsurance risk. For example, many life insurance contracts both guarantee aminimum rate of return to policyholders (creating financial risk) and promisedeath benefits that at some times significantly exceed the policyholder’s accountbalance (creating insurance risk in the form of mortality risk). Such contracts areinsurance contracts.

Under some contracts, an insured event triggers the payment of an amountlinked to a price index. Such contracts are insurance contracts, provided thepayment that is contingent on the insured event can be significant. For example,a life-contingent annuity linked to a cost-of-living index transfers insurance riskbecause payment is triggered by an uncertain event—the survival of theannuitant. The link to the price index is an embedded derivative, but it alsotransfers insurance risk. If the resulting transfer of insurance risk is significant,the embedded derivative meets the definition of an insurance contract, in whichcase it need not be separated and measured at fair value (see paragraph 7 ofthisIFRS).

The definition of insurance risk refers to risk that the insurer accepts from thepolicyholder. In other words, insurance risk is a pre-existing risk transferred fromthe policyholder to the insurer. Thus, a new risk created by the contract is notinsurance risk.

The definition of an insurance contract refers to an adverse effect on thepolicyholder. The definition does not limit the payment by the insurer to anamount equal to the financial impact of the adverse event. For example, thedefinition does not exclude ‘new-for-old’ coverage that pays the policyholdersufficient to permit replacement of a damaged old asset by a new asset. Similarly,the definition does not limit payment under a term life insurance contract to thefinancial loss suffered by the deceased’s dependants, nor does it preclude thepayment of predetermined amounts to quantify the loss caused by death oranaccident.

Some contracts require a payment if a specified uncertain event occurs, but donot require an adverse effect on the policyholder as a precondition for payment.Such a contract is not an insurance contract even if the holder uses the contractto mitigate an underlying risk exposure. For example, if the holder uses aderivative to hedge an underlying non-financial variable that is correlated withcash flows from an asset of the entity, the derivative is not an insurance contractbecause payment is not conditional on whether the holder is adversely affected bya reduction in the cash flows from the asset. Conversely, the definition of aninsurance contract refers to an uncertain event for which an adverse effect on thepolicyholder is a contractual precondition for payment. This contractualprecondition does not require the insurer to investigate whether the eventactually caused an adverse effect, but permits the insurer to deny payment if it isnot satisfied that the event caused an adverse effect.

Lapse or persistency risk (ie the risk that the counterparty will cancel the contractearlier or later than the issuer had expected in pricing the contract) is notinsurance risk because the payment to the counterparty is not contingent on anuncertain future event that adversely affects the counterparty. Similarly, expense

B11

B12

B13

B14

B15

©

IASCF557

IFRS 4

risk (ie the risk of unexpected increases in the administrative costs associatedwith the servicing of a contract, rather than in costs associated with insuredevents) is not insurance risk because an unexpected increase in expenses does notadversely affect the counterparty.

B16

Therefore, a contract that exposes the issuer to lapse risk, persistency risk orexpense risk is not an insurance contract unless it also exposes the issuer toinsurance risk. However, if the issuer of that contract mitigates that risk by usinga second contract to transfer part of that risk to another party, the secondcontract exposes that other party to insurance risk.

An insurer can accept significant insurance risk from the policyholder only if theinsurer is an entity separate from the policyholder. In the case of a mutualinsurer, the mutual accepts risk from each policyholder and pools that risk.Although policyholders bear that pooled risk collectively in their capacity asowners, the mutual has still accepted the risk that is the essence of an insurancecontract.

B17

Examples of insurance contracts

B18

The following are examples of contracts that are insurance contracts, if thetransfer of insurance risk is significant: (a)(b)(c)

insurance against theft or damage to property.

insurance against product liability, professional liability, civil liability orlegal expenses.

life insurance and prepaid funeral plans (although death is certain, it isuncertain when death will occur or, for some types of life insurance,whether death will occur within the period covered by the insurance).life-contingent annuities and pensions (ie contracts that providecompensation for the uncertain future event—the survival of the annuitantor pensioner—to assist the annuitant or pensioner in maintaining a givenstandard of living, which would otherwise be adversely affected by his orher survival).

disability and medical cover.

surety bonds, fidelity bonds, performance bonds and bid bonds(iecontracts that provide compensation if another party fails to perform acontractual obligation, for example an obligation to construct a building).credit insurance that provides for specified payments to be made toreimburse the holder for a loss it incurs because a specified debtor fails tomake payment when due under the original or modified terms of a debtinstrument. These contracts could have various legal forms, such as that ofa guarantee, some types of letter of credit, a credit derivative defaultcontract or an insurance contract. However, although these contracts meetthe definition of an insurance contract, they also meet the definition of afinancial guarantee contract in IAS 39 and are within the scope of IAS 32*and IAS 39, not this IFRS (see paragraph 4(d)). Nevertheless, if an issuer of

(d)

(e)(f)

(g)

*When an entity applies IFRS7, the reference to IAS32 is replaced by a reference to IFRS7.

558

©

IASCF

IFRS 4

financial guarantee contracts has previously asserted explicitly that itregards such contracts as insurance contracts and has used accountingapplicable to insurance contracts, the issuer may elect to apply eitherIAS39 and IAS32* or this Standard to such financial guarantee contracts.(h)

product warranties. Product warranties issued by another party for goodssold by a manufacturer, dealer or retailer are within the scope of this IFRS.However, product warranties issued directly by a manufacturer, dealer orretailer are outside its scope, because they are within the scope of IAS18and IAS37.

title insurance (ie insurance against the discovery of defects in title to landthat were not apparent when the insurance contract was written). In thiscase, the insured event is the discovery of a defect in the title, not the defectitself.

travel assistance (ie compensation in cash or in kind to policyholders forlosses suffered while they are travelling). Paragraphs B6 and B7 discusssome contracts of this kind.

catastrophe bonds that provide for reduced payments of principal, interestor both if a specified event adversely affects the issuer of the bond (unlessthe specified event does not create significant insurance risk, for example ifthe event is a change in an interest rate or foreign exchange rate).

insurance swaps and other contracts that require a payment based onchanges in climatic, geological or other physical variables that are specificto a party to the contract.reinsurance contracts.

(i)

(j)

(k)

(l)

(m)

B19

The following are examples of items that are not insurance contracts: (a)

investment contracts that have the legal form of an insurance contract butdo not expose the insurer to significant insurance risk, for example lifeinsurance contracts in which the insurer bears no significant mortality risk(such contracts are non-insurance financial instruments or servicecontracts, see paragraphs B20 and B21).

contracts that have the legal form of insurance, but pass all significantinsurance risk back to the policyholder through non-cancellable andenforceable mechanisms that adjust future payments by the policyholderas a direct result of insured losses, for example some financial reinsurancecontracts or some group contracts (such contracts are normallynon-insurance financial instruments or service contracts, see paragraphsB20 and B21).

self-insurance, in other words retaining a risk that could have been coveredby insurance (there is no insurance contract because there is no agreementwith another party).

contracts (such as gambling contracts) that require a payment if a specifieduncertain future event occurs, but do not require, as a contractualprecondition for payment, that the event adversely affects the policyholder.

(b)

(c)

(d)

*When an entity applies IFRS7, the reference to IAS32 is replaced by a reference to IFRS7.

©

IASCF559

IFRS 4

However, this does not preclude the specification of a predeterminedpayout to quantify the loss caused by a specified event such as death or anaccident (see also paragraph B13). (e)

derivatives that expose one party to financial risk but not insurance risk,because they require that party to make payment based solely on changesin one or more of a specified interest rate, financial instrument price,commodity price, foreign exchange rate, index of prices or rates, creditrating or credit index or other variable, provided in the case of anon-financial variable that the variable is not specific to a party to thecontract (see IAS39).

a credit-related guarantee (or letter of credit, credit derivative defaultcontract or credit insurance contract) that requires payments even if theholder has not incurred a loss on the failure of the debtor to makepayments when due (see IAS39).

contracts that require a payment based on a climatic, geological or otherphysical variable that is not specific to a party to the contract (commonlydescribed as weather derivatives).

catastrophe bonds that provide for reduced payments of principal, interestor both, based on a climatic, geological or other physical variable that isnot specific to a party to the contract.

(f)

(g)

(h)

B20

If the contracts described in paragraph B19 create financial assets or financialliabilities, they are within the scope of IAS39. Among other things, this meansthat the parties to the contract use what is sometimes called deposit accounting,which involves the following: (a)(b)

one party recognises the consideration received as a financial liability,rather than as revenue.

the other party recognises the consideration paid as a financial asset,rather than as an expense.

B21

If the contracts described in paragraph B19 do not create financial assets orfinancial liabilities, IAS 18 applies. Under IAS 18, revenue associated with atransaction involving the rendering of services is recognised by reference to thestage of completion of the transaction if the outcome of the transaction can beestimated reliably.

Significant insurance risk

B22

A contract is an insurance contract only if it transfers significant insurance risk.Paragraphs B8–B21 discuss insurance risk. The following paragraphs discuss theassessment of whether insurance risk is significant.

Insurance risk is significant if, and only if, an insured event could cause aninsurer to pay significant additional benefits in any scenario, excluding scenariosthat lack commercial substance (ie have no discernible effect on the economics ofthe transaction). If significant additional benefits would be payable in scenariosthat have commercial substance, the condition in the previous sentence may be

B23

560

©

IASCF

IFRS 4

met even if the insured event is extremely unlikely or even if the expected(ieprobability-weighted) present value of contingent cash flows is a smallproportion of the expected present value of all the remaining contractual cashflows.

B24

The additional benefits described in paragraph B23 refer to amounts that exceedthose that would be payable if no insured event occurred (excluding scenariosthat lack commercial substance). Those additional amounts include claimshandling and claims assessment costs, but exclude: (a)

the loss of the ability to charge the policyholder for future services.Forexample, in an investment-linked life insurance contract, the death ofthe policyholder means that the insurer can no longer perform investmentmanagement services and collect a fee for doing so. However, thiseconomic loss for the insurer does not reflect insurance risk, just as amutual fund manager does not take on insurance risk in relation to thepossible death of the client. Therefore, the potential loss of futureinvestment management fees is not relevant in assessing how muchinsurance risk is transferred by a contract.

waiver on death of charges that would be made on cancellation orsurrender. Because the contract brought those charges into existence, thewaiver of these charges does not compensate the policyholder for apre-existing risk. Hence, they are not relevant in assessing how muchinsurance risk is transferred by a contract.

a payment conditional on an event that does not cause a significant loss tothe holder of the contract. For example, consider a contract that requiresthe issuer to pay one million currency units if an asset suffers physicaldamage causing an insignificant economic loss of one currency unit to theholder. In this contract, the holder transfers to the insurer theinsignificant risk of losing one currency unit. At the same time, thecontract creates non-insurance risk that the issuer will need to pay 999,999currency units if the specified event occurs. Because the issuer does notaccept significant insurance risk from the holder, this contract is not aninsurance contract.

possible reinsurance recoveries. The insurer accounts for these separately.

(b)

(c)

(d)

B25

An insurer shall assess the significance of insurance risk contract by contract,rather than by reference to materiality to the financial statements.* Thus,insurance risk may be significant even if there is a minimal probability ofmaterial losses for a whole book of contracts. This contract-by-contractassessment makes it easier to classify a contract as an insurance contract.However, if a relatively homogeneous book of small contracts is known to consistof contracts that all transfer insurance risk, an insurer need not examine eachcontract within that book to identify a few non-derivative contracts that transferinsignificant insurance risk.

*

For this purpose, contracts entered into simultaneously with a single counterparty (orcontractsthat are otherwise interdependent) form a single contract.

©

IASCF561

IFRS 4

B26

It follows from paragraphs B23–B25 that if a contract pays a death benefitexceeding the amount payable on survival, the contract is an insurance contractunless the additional death benefit is insignificant (judged by reference to thecontract rather than to an entire book of contracts). As noted in paragraph B24(b),the waiver on death of cancellation or surrender charges is not included in thisassessment if this waiver does not compensate the policyholder for a pre-existingrisk. Similarly, an annuity contract that pays out regular sums for the rest of apolicyholder’s life is an insurance contract, unless the aggregate life-contingentpayments are insignificant.

Paragraph B23 refers to additional benefits. These additional benefits couldinclude a requirement to pay benefits earlier if the insured event occurs earlierand the payment is not adjusted for the time value of money. An example iswhole life insurance for a fixed amount (in other words, insurance that providesa fixed death benefit whenever the policyholder dies, with no expiry date for thecover). It is certain that the policyholder will die, but the date of death isuncertain. The insurer will suffer a loss on those individual contracts for whichpolicyholders die early, even if there is no overall loss on the whole book ofcontracts.

If an insurance contract is unbundled into a deposit component and an insurancecomponent, the significance of insurance risk transfer is assessed by reference tothe insurance component. The significance of insurance risk transferred by anembedded derivative is assessed by reference to the embedded derivative.

B27

B28

Changes in the level of insurance risk

B29

Some contracts do not transfer any insurance risk to the issuer at inception,although they do transfer insurance risk at a later time. For example, consider acontract that provides a specified investment return and includes an option forthe policyholder to use the proceeds of the investment on maturity to buy alife-contingent annuity at the current annuity rates charged by the insurer toother new annuitants when the policyholder exercises the option. The contracttransfers no insurance risk to the issuer until the option is exercised, because theinsurer remains free to price the annuity on a basis that reflects the insurance risktransferred to the insurer at that time. However, if the contract specifies theannuity rates (or a basis for setting the annuity rates), the contract transfersinsurance risk to the issuer at inception.

A contract that qualifies as an insurance contract remains an insurance contractuntil all rights and obligations are extinguished or expire.

B30

562

©

IASCF

IFRS 4

Appendix C

Amendments to other IFRSs

The amendments in this appendix shall be applied for annual periods beginning on or after1January2005. If an entity adopts this IFRS for an earlier period, these amendments shall be appliedfor that earlier period.

* * * * *

The amendments contained in this appendix when this IFRS was issued in 2004 have been incorporatedinto the relevant IFRSs published in this volume.

©

IASCF563